🔗 Share this article

This is Black History Month in the Britain, and it appears it’s time for a rethink. Throughout its history, an celebration that was initiated as a commemorative event of heritage, traditions and links between global Black communities, has taken on a business-like atmosphere, growing to encompass gatherings where African descendants are remunerated to talk to Caucasian groups about hidden biases and “allyship”. The 2020s Black Lives Matter protests sparked an increase in the enterprise of displaying cultural sensitivity. Yet, that phase is now over. The surge has peaked, resulting in a somewhat empty inheritance of what promoting consciousness is for.

The Origins of Black History Celebration

First commemorated in the America and its northern neighbor, Black History Month was conceived in 1962 as an observance of African American heritage by African American historian Carter G. Woodson with a week of celebration and reflection in the second week of February. Black History Month grew out of this movement and was officially launched in 1970. Currently it is marked not only in the North America in the second month, but also in autumn in the UK, the Federal Republic of Germany, Ireland and the the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

The observance has transformed since that time, giving reduced attention to the narratives of colonial slavery and civil rights battles, and greater focus on notable African descendants in government, the arts, and social movements, and broadly celebrating the impact Black people have made to influence the nation. It is in schools where Black History Month is most regularly observed, with talks and cultural events. But the way the observance is commemorated is a indication of the current political situation. How it progresses is a good lesson in how assimilation leads to weakening: the restructuring of Black History Month has stymied the point of it, which is to confront systemic and institutional racism.

---

A Disconcerting Period

Hardly anything shows how critical it is to rethink Black History Month more than the current time in which it occurs this year. In the United Kingdom, a resurgent right in the shape of the Reform political group is ahead in surveys. In the summer we saw the largest far-right rally in the UK's past. a prominent political figure, the Black leader of the Tory party, is a firm opponent of anti-racism activism, and we are in a place where a elected representative gains confidence to declare that “not seeing any white faces” in certain urban areas is a cause for alarm. Meanwhile, far-right parties are expanding in the European continent as a whole.

In the America, a massive attack against DEI and affirmative action has been brought, often successfully, to the highest courts of the state. A campaign to scrub Black history and legacy from the archives is ongoing. One of the political figure's initial presidential directives focused on the museum of African American legacy, and the Smithsonian Institution, claiming they of a “concerted and widespread effort to change the national past” by portraying America “as naturally discriminatory”.

Against this backdrop, the observance represents how little it can be impactful if it is confined to either dutiful corporate observances, or stripped of political content celebrations of contributions in the past, rather than confronting the conditions of the current era. It also reveals how its limited duration means that it is separated from the wider consistent effort that is necessary. A university professor, a educator at a learning establishment, articulated it most accurately when she voiced worries about the temporary “tokenism” of the month. “The problem with embracing a superficial method”, she stated, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month turns into a fleeting performance rather than a catalyst for change.”

---

Reevaluating, Not Abandoning

Determining how to alter, change and broaden efforts for equal rights and acknowledgment in such times of discouragement and concern is a difficult task. There is a urge to just discontinue observances such as Black History Month altogether, assuming they are inadequate for current needs, or are relics of an era that has been ineffective.

But despite everything, Black History Month, and in fact the whole broad system and legacy of activism for racial justice – local anti-racism groups, inclusion and equity efforts, and yes, even those talks to businesses – form an infrastructure that a significant effort has gone into. It is there not only to deteriorate as the political landscape shifts (and in fact, deteriorates), but to be a vital organism.

So what would a fresh vibrant Black History Month appear as? Well, first, it would be not just one concentrated month: something that is distributed through the year (as certain organizations are already beginning to do), elements of its material (particularly around prominent figures of color) integrated into educational programs. It would also be a time that does not evade governmental matters, and leaves space for citizens, particularly youth, to express their concerns and stories. What value has mere awareness of the history when it fails to address the current situation of extreme conservative demonstrations in the urban areas? Organizations who mark it should not be reassured with the neutral terminology of implicit prejudice and sensitivity to “microaggressions”, but challenged by the dangers that face all if fight against prejudice is not taken seriously. Briefly stated, Black History Month should be made contemporary, critical, and adaptive. It could be that an total re-identification is in order – Contemporary Black History Month.